Images courtesy of the AP. Click to enlarge.
In the aftermath of the sh*tstorm generated by his tweet, Roger Ebert avoided apologizing for the message, saying that the timing of his tweet was unseemly. Frankly, Ebert would have done better not to apologize at all, then to offer a paltry: "Sorry, what I said was unseemly." That's like saying: "I'm sorry YOU WERE OFFENDED by what I said." Knowing that Ryan Dunn had a blood alcohol content above the legal limit would seem to vindicate Ebert in the eyes of his twitter defenders, but, frankly, whatever the case was around Dunn's death, sending a tweet to thousands immediately after the incident that could be interpreted as making light of the event is completely uncalled for. Ebert's defenders allege that he was trying to remind people of the dangers of drinking and driving, but that argument has no weight at all. You can bet your bottom dollar that people following Ebert on twitter know that drinking and driving is wrong, and conveying this alleged humanitarian message did not require the cutting wit that Ebert has honed over a decades-long career as a film critic. Shame on you, Roger Ebert! Obviously, he did not get an invite to the funeral.
Bam and wife.
Bam's parents arrive at the funeral home.
Ryan Dunn on the night in question. via Twitter